408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9372776)
1. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult.
Callaghan JJ; Forest EE; Sporer SM; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):257-62. PubMed ID: 9372776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases.
Datir SP; Wynn-Jones CH
Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 16470434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Fyda TM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak J; Johnston RC
Iowa Orthop J; 2002; 22():8-19. PubMed ID: 12180617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year survivorship of rough-surfaced femoral stem with geometry similar to Charnley femoral stem.
Datir SP; Kurta IC; Wynn-Jones CH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 16627148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term survivorship of cemented all-polyethylene acetabular components in patients > 75 years of age.
Levy BA; Berry DJ; Pagnano MW
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 10884206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 100 cemented versus 100 noncemented stems with comparison of 25 matched pairs.
D'Lima DD; Oishi CS; Petersilge WJ; Colwell CW; Walker RH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):140-8. PubMed ID: 9553546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extensively coated femoral components in young patients.
Kronick JL; Barba ML; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):263-74. PubMed ID: 9372777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term fate of uncemented, threaded acetabular components with smooth surface treatment: minimum 10-year follow-up of two different designs.
Aldinger PR; Thomsen M; Lukoschek M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Sep; 124(7):469-75. PubMed ID: 15241616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total hip arthroplasty with cement and use of a collared matte-finish femoral component: nineteen to twenty-year follow-up.
Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Firestone DE; Yehyawi TM; Goetz DD; Sullivan J; Vittetoe DA; O'Rourke MR; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Feb; 90(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 18245589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
