These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9373125)

  • 41. The use of the G1 and Octosmart programs in detecting temporal changes in the visual field.
    Fankhauser F; Gloor B; Iliev M; Kalman A
    Int Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 21(6):311-7. PubMed ID: 9869338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
    Kogure S; Toda Y; Crabb D; Kashiwagi K; Fitzke FW; Tsukahara S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 87(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 12714404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V; Kong GXY; Singh A; Panigrahi A; Gupta S; Prea S; Vingrys AJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Behera G; Waghmare SV; Ramasamy A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):557-565. PubMed ID: 35947251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population.
    Birt CM; Shin DH; Samudrala V; Hughes BA; Kim C; Lee D
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Jul; 104(7):1126-30. PubMed ID: 9224465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Cello KE; Nelson-Quigg JM; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 10704546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry.
    Roberti G; Manni G; Riva I; Holló G; Quaranta L; Agnifili L; Figus M; Giammaria S; Rastelli D; Oddone F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186793. PubMed ID: 29077730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Detection of early visual field change in ocular hypertension using STATPAC.
    Park HJ; Kim DM; Youn DH; Hong C
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2214246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis Based Prediction of Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field Thresholds in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Guo Z; Kwon YH; Lee K; Wang K; Wahle A; Alward WLM; Fingert JH; Bettis DI; Johnson CA; Garvin MK; Sonka M; Abràmoff MD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Aug; 58(10):3975-3985. PubMed ID: 28796875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Test-retest repeatability of the imo binocular random single-eye test and Humphrey monocular test in patients with glaucoma.
    Toyokuni H; Sakamoto M; Ueda K; Kurimoto T; Yamada-Nakanishi Y; Nakamura M
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 67(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 37392238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of the Performance of a Novel, Smartphone-based, Head-mounted Perimeter (GearVision) With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Pradhan ZS; Sircar T; Agrawal H; Rao HL; Bopardikar A; Devi S; Tiwari VN
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):e146-e152. PubMed ID: 33596021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Use of a blue filter in visual field analysis.
    Hugkulstone CE; Vernon SA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1991 Mar; 75(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 2012781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Zeppieri M; Brusini P; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Salvetat ML
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19800607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.
    O'Brien C; Poinoosawmy D; Wu J; Hitchings R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 78(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7918261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
    Kulkarni SV; Coupland SG; Stitt DM; Hamilton J; Brownstein JJ; Damji KF
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 24093188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.