114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9373126)
1. Automated perimetry in detecting threats to fixation.
Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1918-20. PubMed ID: 9373126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.
Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated perimetry and threats to fixation.
Realini T; Khouri AS
Ophthalmology; 1998 Sep; 105(9):1575; author reply 1575-6. PubMed ID: 9754152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated perimetry and threats to fixation.
Honavar SG
Ophthalmology; 1998 Sep; 105(9):1574-5. PubMed ID: 9754151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chu DH; Xu L; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of cataract surgery on automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
Hayashi K; Hayashi H; Nakao F; Hayashi F
Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 132(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11438052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Functional Change in Preperimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma Using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry.
Jung KI; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():35-44. PubMed ID: 28734817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency doubling technology perimetry.
Kogure S; Toda Y; Tsukahara S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 16488960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
Kulkarni SV; Coupland SG; Stitt DM; Hamilton J; Brownstein JJ; Damji KF
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 24093188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effects of Nocturnal Dip and Blood Pressure Variability on Paracentral Scotoma in Early Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Jin SW; Seo HR; Rho SS; Rho SH
Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(4):504-510. PubMed ID: 27128963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threat to fixation at diagnosis and lifetime risk of visual impairment in open-angle glaucoma.
Peters D; Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2015 May; 122(5):1034-9. PubMed ID: 25537196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Westcott MC; McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 9274408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field.
Park HY; Hwang BE; Shin HY; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():150-9. PubMed ID: 26476213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [What new knowledge has automated perimetry with the Octopus brought on glaucomatous visual field changes?].
Gloor B; Stürmer J; Vökt B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Apr; 184(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 6727246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Peritest automatic perimeter in screening for glaucomatous visual field defects.
Douglas GR
Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 18(7):318-20. PubMed ID: 6671150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective perimetry in glaucoma: recent advances with multifocal stimuli.
Graham SL; Klistorner A; Grigg JR; Billson FA
Surv Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 43 Suppl 1():S199-209. PubMed ID: 10416764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
