These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9373745)

  • 1. Audiometer calibration: two neglected areas.
    Smith PA; Foster JR
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Oct; 31(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 9373745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High frequency Bekesy audiometry. I: equipment and calibration.
    Gauz MT; Brey RH; Ahroon WA
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):279-94. PubMed ID: 7349307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent changes in audiometric standards.
    Shipton MS
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Aug; 23(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 2790313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplitude variation in calibrated audiometer systems in clinical simulations.
    Barlow C; Davison L; Ashmore M; Weinstein R
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(72):299-305. PubMed ID: 25209040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
    Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment using 'clicks' as test signals.
    Richter U; Fedtke T
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):478-87. PubMed ID: 16149243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Comparison of two methods.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 1842286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.
    Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiometer calibration: interpreting and applying the standards.
    Lightfoot GR
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Oct; 34(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 11081756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Free-field sensitivity level of audiometric earphones to be used for speech audiometer calibration.
    Brinkmann K; Richter U
    Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 2756336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone conduction errors at high frequencies: implications for clinical and medico-legal practice.
    Lightfoot GR; Hughes JB
    J Laryngol Otol; 1993 Apr; 107(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 8320514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Age and sex variations.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M; Bloigu R
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 1842287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of temperature on the performance of audiometric mechanical coupler systems.
    Dowson SP; McNeill HA
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Oct; 26(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 1486355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone.
    Van der Aerschot M; Swanepoel de W; Mahomed-Asmail F; Myburgh HC; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):616-22. PubMed ID: 27610920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tinnitus measurement with conventional audiometer versus high-frequency audiometer].
    López-González MA; Cambil E; Abrante A; López-Fernández R; Barea E; Esteban F
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2012; 63(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 22152652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.