These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9373745)

  • 21. Calibration force levels for bone conduction vibrators.
    Billings BL; Winter M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 604679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
    Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Audiometer calibration: applying the earphone to the coupler.
    Haughton PM
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Jun; 29(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 8574204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Advantages with a new Bekesy audiometer in the measurement of noise induced hearing loss.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):265-72. PubMed ID: 6939097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electro-acoustic performance of the new bone vibrator Radioear B81: a comparison with the conventional Radioear B71.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Johannsen L; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 25519145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acceleration levels at hearing threshold with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction.
    Håkansson B; Tjellström A; Rosenhall U
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 100(3-4):240-52. PubMed ID: 4061074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Normative Wave V latency-intensity functions using the EARTONE 3A insert earphone and the Radioear B-71 bone vibrator.
    Beattie RC
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 9638831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test.
    Yu J; Ostevik A; Hodgetts B; Ho A
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of static force on bone conduction hearing thresholds and comfort.
    Toll LE; Emanuel DC; Letowski T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):632-5. PubMed ID: 21506894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips.
    O'Brien A; Keidser G; Yeend I; Hartley L; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):868-76. PubMed ID: 20812890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Computer-assisted audiometry].
    Arifov SS; Razhabov FF; Khasanov AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2001; (1):30-2. PubMed ID: 11247243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Free voice and pure tone audiometer for routine testing of auditory acuity; studies on comparative efficiency.
    HARRIS JD
    Arch Otolaryngol (1925); 1946 Oct; 44(4):452-67. PubMed ID: 21002091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [From the expert office: pseudo-"air-bone-gap" in sensorineural hearing loss].
    Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2010 Jan; 89(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 20058216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing screening with portable screening pure-tone audiometer and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wang YF; Wang SS; Tai CC; Lin LC; Shiao AS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Jun; 65(6):285-92. PubMed ID: 12201570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the Etymotic Research ER-10C otoacoustic emission probe.
    Zebian M; Hensel J; Fedtke T; Vollbort S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):564-8. PubMed ID: 22537036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.