These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 937433)

  • 1. Premature ventricular systole detection by applanation tonometry.
    Lichter PR; Bergstrom TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1976 Jun; 81(6):797-803. PubMed ID: 937433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goldmann applanation tonometry without fluorescein.
    Bright DC; Potter JW; Allen DC; Spruance RD
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Dec; 58(12):1120-6. PubMed ID: 7325201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry.
    Quaranta L; Konstas AG; Rossetti L; Garcia-Feijoo J; O'Brien C; Nasr MB; Fogagnolo P; Demos CM; Stewart JA; Stewart WC
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Jul; 24(7):1252-8. PubMed ID: 19960033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry.
    Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Vasilopoulos K; Skourtis G; Papadopoulos GE; Petropoulos IK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Apr; 232(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 25902089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Proview phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Morledge-Hampton SJ; Kwon RO; Krishna R; Debry PW; Willoughby TL
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 41(6):722-6. PubMed ID: 17224953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser.
    Ehrlich JR; Haseltine S; Shimmyo M; Radcliffe NM
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Oct; 24(10):1555-60. PubMed ID: 20508652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glaucoma screening in primary care: the role of noncontact tonometry.
    Ralston ME; Choplin NT; Hollenbach KA; Applegate BJ; Henn TW
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Jan; 34(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 1728657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements.
    Gaton DD; Ehrenberg M; Lusky M; Wussuki-Lior O; Dotan G; Weinberger D; Snir M
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jun; 35(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 20465440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.
    Wachtl J; Töteberg-Harms M; Frimmel S; Roos M; Kniestedt C
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 135(6):601-608. PubMed ID: 28494071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tonometry.
    Ottar WL
    Insight; 1998 Mar; 23(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9866522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.
    Gandhi NG; Prakalapakorn SG; El-Dairi MA; Jones SK; Freedman SF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry].
    Domke N; Hager A; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Jul; 103(7):583-7. PubMed ID: 16786183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Gunvant P; Baskaran M; Vijaya L; Joseph IS; Watkins RJ; Nallapothula M; Broadway DC; O'Leary DJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 88(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 15031169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Hallberg P; Eklund A; Bäcklund T; Lindén C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17224756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diaton tonometry: an assessment of validity and preference against Goldmann tonometry.
    Doherty MD; Carrim ZI; O'Neill DP
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e171-5. PubMed ID: 21718408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry : The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry].
    Wachtl J; Töteberg-Harms M; Frimmel S; Kniestedt C
    Ophthalmologe; 2017 Aug; 114(8):716-721. PubMed ID: 27921133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.