These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9374963)
1. A spectrum of health policy methods: lessons from the British. Ganiats TG J Fam Pract; 1997 Nov; 45(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 9374963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The British National Health Service under the Conservatives. Iglehart JK N Engl J Med; 1983 Nov; 309(20):1264-8. PubMed ID: 6633584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The politics of ideology vs. the reality of politics: the case of Britain's National Health Service in the 1980s. Klein R Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1984; 62(1):82-109. PubMed ID: 6559262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is unity wishful thinking? The British response. Brain MC Internist; 1988; 29(5):15. PubMed ID: 10287830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical care reform: lessons from around the world. Rohrer JE J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1997; 19(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 10175518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative health policy travelling seminar. Gorovitz S Health Care Anal; 1995 Nov; 3(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 10156213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Shattuck lecture--the politics of medicine in Britain and the United States. Lister J N Engl J Med; 1986 Jul; 315(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 3088449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care regulatory policy requires centralized authority. Marmor TR; Morone JA Hospitals; 1976 Mar; 50(5):83-4, 86-8. PubMed ID: 815155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Image problems. Science, fear and the politics of mammograms. Speer TL Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Jun; 71(11):36, 38. PubMed ID: 9189023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Political implications of the named-nurse concept. Savage J Nurs Times; 1995 Oct 11-17; 91(41):36-7. PubMed ID: 7479133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ginny's swansong? Dickson N Nurs Times; 1995 Jun 28-Jul 4; 91(26):56. PubMed ID: 7624253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence, not politics, should guide cancer care. Carroll SA Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2010 Aug; 14(4):401. PubMed ID: 20682495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Devolution: the effects on health policy. Catton H Nurs Stand; 1999 Dec 15-2000 Jan 4; 14(13-15):44-6. PubMed ID: 11209373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Casting votes on healthcare. Midterm election referendums bring big money, potential impact on healthcare-mostly with anti-smoking proposals. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(43):6-7, 1. PubMed ID: 17128578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An American in London: the revolution in British medical care. Pyenson B J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 10118224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population. Tscheulin DK; Drevs F Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19449159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. White paper is linguistic Prozac. Nottingham C Nurs Times; 1997 Feb 26-Mar 4; 93(9):23. PubMed ID: 9095901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening. Fletcher SW N Engl J Med; 1997 Apr; 336(16):1180-3. PubMed ID: 9099666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]