These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9375089)

  • 1. Solo surgery--with the aid of a robotic assistant.
    Turner DJ
    J Telemed Telecare; 1996; 2 Suppl 1():46-8. PubMed ID: 9375089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .
    Kavoussi LR; Moore RG; Adams JB; Partin AW
    J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2134-6. PubMed ID: 7500476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.
    Partin AW; Adams JB; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 7582231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY.
    Maheshwari M; Ind T
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 26531201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics.
    Tchartchian G; Dietzel J; Bojahr B; Hackethal A; De Wilde R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 20947079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion.
    Zehnder P; Gill IS
    Curr Opin Urol; 2011 Sep; 21(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 21814054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases.
    Meehan JJ; Sandler A
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 17522913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice-controlled robotic arm in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bacá I; Schultz C; Grzybowski L; Göetzen V
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):409-12. PubMed ID: 10411970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First clinical experience in urologic surgery with a novel robotic lightweight laparoscope holder.
    Long JA; Tostain J; Lanchon C; Voros S; Medici M; Descotes JL; Troccaz J; Cinquin P; Rambeaud JJ; Moreau-Gaudry A
    J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22834862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tonatiuh II: assisting manipulator for laparoscopic surgery.
    Martínez AM; Flores RO; Vera MG; Salazar RC; Luis MJ; Daniel L
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2007; 16(5):310-3. PubMed ID: 17917995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative cost analysis of robot-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
    Hyams E; Pierorazio P; Mullins JK; Ward M; Allaf M
    J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):843-7. PubMed ID: 22204599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The EndoAssist robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Gilbert JM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Jul; 91(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 19409150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?
    Rowe CK; Pierce MW; Tecci KC; Houck CS; Mandell J; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
    J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):871-7. PubMed ID: 22283146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no.
    Lotan Y
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 22080872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-analysis comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RC) vs open RC.
    Lee R; Chughtai B; Herman M; Shariat SF; Scherr DS
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):976-83. PubMed ID: 21917100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: yes.
    Liberman D; Trinh QD; Jeldres C; Zorn KC
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 22037320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
    Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.