BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9375385)

  • 1. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 9375385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ; Maguire RW; Mackay HA; Stoddard LT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jan; 51(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 2921589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample.
    Stromer R; McIlvane WJ; Dube WV; Mackay HA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 8433067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing overselective attention to compound visual cues with extended training in adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(2):93-113. PubMed ID: 10817417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
    McCarthy DC; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: the effect of training the component simple discriminations.
    Saunders KJ; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jul; 52(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2769172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verbal self-reports about matching to sample: effects of the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus.
    Critchfield TS; Perone M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):193-214. PubMed ID: 8433064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching-to-sample assessment of stimulus overselectivity in students with intellectual disabilities.
    Dickson CA; Deutsch CK; Wang SS; Dube WV
    Am J Ment Retard; 2006 Nov; 111(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 17029502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intertrial sources of stimulus control and delayed matching-to-sample performance in humans.
    Williams DC; Johnston MD; Saunders KJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):253-67. PubMed ID: 17002231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcer control and human signal-detection performance.
    Johnstone V; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 May; 73(3):275-90. PubMed ID: 10866352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli.
    Saunders RR; Saunders KJ; Kirby KC; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Sep; 50(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 3193052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences.
    de Rose JC; McIlvane WJ; Dube WV; Galpin VC; Stoddard LT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jul; 50(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3171472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model for discriminating reinforcers in time and space.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():62-73. PubMed ID: 27016156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure.
    McIlvane WJ; Kledaras JB; Callahan TC; Dube WV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 11936251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of adolescents' arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations.
    Stromer R; Osborne JG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 May; 37(3):329-48. PubMed ID: 6178786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.
    Alsop B; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1940764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observing behavior and atypically restricted stimulus control.
    Dube WV; Dickson CA; Balsamo LM; O'Donnell KL; Tomanari GY; Farren KM; Wheeler EE; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Nov; 94(3):297-313. PubMed ID: 21541173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Teaching arbitrary matching via sample stimulus-control shaping to young children and mentally retarded individuals: a methodological note.
    Zygmont DM; Lazar RM; Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 1548446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.