These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9375385)

  • 21. Errorless learning: reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting.
    Touchette PE; Howard JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 6735950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re-evaluation of a programmed method to teach generalized identity matching to sample.
    Dube WV; Serna RW
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(4):347-79. PubMed ID: 9690280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Alsop B; Jones BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A sorting-to-matching method to teach compound matching to sample.
    Farber RS; Dube WV; Dickson CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 26843215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Merging separately established stimulus classes with outcome-specific reinforcement.
    Johnson C; Meleshkevich O; Dube WV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jan; 101(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 24248538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Written lists as mediating stimuli in the matching-to-sample performances of individuals with mental retardation.
    Stromer R; Mackay HA; McVay AA; Fowler T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 9532748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: the development of generalized skills.
    Saunders KJ; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Nov; 54(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 2103584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 1402603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ; Mackay HA; Stoddard LT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Mar; 47(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 3572297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stimulus class formation and concept learning: establishment of within- and between-set generalization and transitive relationships via conditional discrimination procedures.
    Haring TG; Breen CG; Laitinen RE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jul; 52(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 2527943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A procedure for generating differential "sample" responding without different exteroceptive stimuli.
    Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 12696739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 25219928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Self-control in mentally retarded adolescents: choice as a function of amount and delay of reinforcement.
    Ragotzy SP; Blakely E; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 3361265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stimulus classes in matching to sample and sequence production: the emergence of numeric relations.
    Maydak M; Stromer R; Mackay HA; Stoddard LT
    Res Dev Disabil; 1995; 16(3):179-204. PubMed ID: 7652201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level.
    Wogar MA; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.
    Northup J; George T; Jones K; Broussard C; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 8682736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.