These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities. Nicholson AS Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting. Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing. Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device. Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spinal compression tolerance limits for the design of manual material handling operations in the workplace. Genaidy AM; Waly SM; Khalil TM; Hidalgo J Ergonomics; 1993 Apr; 36(4):415-34. PubMed ID: 8472689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling. Jäger M; Luttmann A Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting. Howarth SJ; Beach TA; Pearson AJ; Callaghan JP Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 19081557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond psychophysics: the need for a cognitive engineering approach to setting limits in manual lifting tasks. Karwowski W; Lee W; Jamaldin B; Gaddie P; Jang RL; Alqesaimi KK Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):40-60. PubMed ID: 9973871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks. Weston EB; Aurand A; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS Ergonomics; 2018 Jun; 61(6):853-865. PubMed ID: 29241415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Snook SH; Ciriello VM Ergonomics; 1991 Sep; 34(9):1197-213. PubMed ID: 1743178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers. Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secular changes in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces over 20 years for male industrial workers. Ciriello VM; Dempsey PG; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18432440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]