These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9375533)

  • 41. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. High-repetition cyclic loading is a risk factor for a lumbar disorder.
    Navar D; Zhou BH; Lu Y; Solomonow M
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Nov; 34(5):614-22. PubMed ID: 16892430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Diseases of the dorsal-lumbar spine and manual handling of loads: guidelines for fitness assessment].
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E; Menoni O; Bonaiuti D; Cantoni S; Molteni G; Grieco A
    Med Lav; 1993; 84(5):416-32. PubMed ID: 8114655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling.
    de Looze MP; van Greuningen K; Rebel J; Kingma I; Kuijer PP
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 10755660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mechanical loading on the low back in three methods of refuse collecting.
    de Looze MP; Stassen AR; Markslag AM; Borst MJ; Wooning MM; Toussaint HM
    Ergonomics; 1995 Oct; 38(10):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 7588581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Determination of the effect of lift characteristics on dynamic performance profiles during manual materials handling tasks.
    Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Barin K
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):126-45. PubMed ID: 9973876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of changing patient-handling technique.
    Schibye B; Hansen AF; Hye-Knudsen CT; Essendrop M; Böcher M; Skotte J
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Mar; 34(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 12628568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A biomechanical analysis of methods used for transferring totally dependent patients.
    Ulin SS; Chaffin DB; Patellos CL; Blitz SG; Emerick CA; Lundy F; Misher L
    SCI Nurs; 1997 Mar; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9165952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of patient transferring tasks: bed to wheelchair and wheelchair to bed.
    Garg A; Owen B; Beller D; Banaag J
    Ergonomics; 1991 Mar; 34(3):289-312. PubMed ID: 1829037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K; Waikar A; Aghazadeh F
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantification of back motion during asymmetric lifting.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):845-59. PubMed ID: 1633792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of initial horizontal object position on peak L5/S1 moments in manual lifting is dependent on task type and familiarity with alternative lifting strategies.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2011 Jan; 54(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 21181590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles.
    Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Load spatial pathway and spine loading: how does lift origin and destination influence low back response?
    Davis K; Marras W
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):1031-46. PubMed ID: 16147419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Lifting capacity of workers.
    Ayoub MM
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1977 Dec; 6(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 617654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Blick AC; Wilkinson PL
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 2354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Lewis KE; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1216-32. PubMed ID: 10503055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.