343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9376552)
1. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T].
Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging.
Facius M; Renz DM; Neubauer H; Böttcher J; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 17996602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation.
Mossa-Basha M; Fundaro GM; Shah BA; Ali S; Pantelic MV
Radiographics; 2010 Oct; 30(6):1673-87. PubMed ID: 21071382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential role of magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities in ductal carcinoma in situ detection.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Daniel BL
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):345-56, vii. PubMed ID: 11493424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Orel SG; Mendonca MH; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 9015067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of time-intensity curves in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mastopathy obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Nishiura M; Yasuhiro T; Murase K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 20833496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dynamic MR-mammography in invasive lobular breast cancer].
Sittek H; Perlet C; Untch M; Kessler M; Reiser M
Rontgenpraxis; 1998; 51(7):235-42. PubMed ID: 9793406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography.
Vag T; Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Pfleiderer SO; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 19006771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma.
Schouten van der Velden AP; Boetes C; Bult P; Wobbes T
Am J Surg; 2006 Aug; 192(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16860625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
