These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9376552)

  • 1. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
    Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T].
    Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
    Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Facius M; Renz DM; Neubauer H; Böttcher J; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 17996602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
    Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis.
    Vag T; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Benndorf M; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):955-61. PubMed ID: 20942728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
    Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
    Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation.
    Mossa-Basha M; Fundaro GM; Shah BA; Ali S; Pantelic MV
    Radiographics; 2010 Oct; 30(6):1673-87. PubMed ID: 21071382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
    Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential role of magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities in ductal carcinoma in situ detection.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; Daniel BL
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):345-56, vii. PubMed ID: 11493424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Orel SG; Mendonca MH; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Sullivan DC
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 9015067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
    Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of time-intensity curves in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mastopathy obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nishiura M; Yasuhiro T; Murase K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 20833496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dynamic MR-mammography in invasive lobular breast cancer].
    Sittek H; Perlet C; Untch M; Kessler M; Reiser M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1998; 51(7):235-42. PubMed ID: 9793406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography.
    Vag T; Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Pfleiderer SO; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 19006771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
    Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
    Kaiser WA
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
    Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma.
    Schouten van der Velden AP; Boetes C; Bult P; Wobbes T
    Am J Surg; 2006 Aug; 192(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16860625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.