These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9378153)

  • 21. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
    Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
    Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
    Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
    Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study.
    Akahira J; Konno R; Moriya T; Yamakawa H; Igarashi T; Ito K; Sato S; Yajima A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 11093051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal involvement after large loop excision of transformation zone in patients with cervical cancerous lesion.
    Lee SE; Kim JW; Kang SB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 89(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 15777902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Prevention of obstetrical complications following LEEP, is it possible?].
    Baldauf JJ; Baulon E; Thoma V; Akladios CY
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 Jan; 43(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24332739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
    Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for conization of the uterine cervix.
    Chen RJ; Chang DY; Yen ML; Chow SN; Huang SC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1994 Mar; 93(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 7920057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for borderline lesions of the uterine cervix].
    Matsuyama T; Tsukamoto N; Kashimura M; Iwasaka T; Saito T; Uchino H; Nakano H; Matsukuma K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 36(11):2063-71. PubMed ID: 6512325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An analysis of the outcomes of cervical cone biopsies performed in a low resource setting.
    Okonkwo CA; Selo-Ojeme DO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(6):604-7. PubMed ID: 26418271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
    Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Knife conization versus loop excision--clinical and histomorphologic results].
    Girardi F; Heydarfadai M; Koroschetz F; Pickel H; Winter R
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 7987084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Big cones and little cones.
    Rubio CA; Thomassen P; Söderberg G; Kock Y
    Histopathology; 1978 Mar; 2(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 352896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
    Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Positive results of endocervical curettage as an indication for conization of the cervix.
    Glazer JD; Benrubi GI; Nuss RC
    South Med J; 1987 Feb; 80(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 3810213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
    Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.