118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9378733)
1. Quality of data regarding diagnoses of spinal disorders in administrative databases. A multicenter study.
Faciszewski T; Broste SK; Fardon D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Oct; 79(10):1481-8. PubMed ID: 9378733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion.
Gologorsky Y; Knightly JJ; Chi JH; Groff MW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):984-93. PubMed ID: 25325170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving discharge data fidelity for use in large administrative databases.
Gologorsky Y; Knightly JJ; Lu Y; Chi JH; Groff MW
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E2. PubMed ID: 24881634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedural coding of spinal surgeries (CPT-4 versus ICD-9-CM) and decisions regarding standards: a multicenter study.
Faciszewski T; Jensen R; Berg RL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(5):502-7. PubMed ID: 12616165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of pulmonary embolism ICD-10 codes in emergency department administrative data: let the buyer beware.
Burles K; Innes G; Senior K; Lang E; McRae A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):89. PubMed ID: 28595574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Administrative database concerns: accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding is poor for preoperative anemia in patients undergoing spinal fusion.
Golinvaux NS; Bohl DD; Basques BA; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Nov; 39(24):2019-23. PubMed ID: 25202941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Administrative databases' complication coding in anterior spinal fusion procedures. What does it mean?
Faciszewski T; Johnson L; Noren C; Smith MD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Aug; 20(16):1783-8. PubMed ID: 7502134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality of the diagnoses' coding (main or associated diagnoses) in the medico-administrative database for psychiatric care (RIM-P) in 2015 and 2016, France].
Richaud-Eyraud E; Ellini A; Clément MC; Menu A; Dubois J
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2019 Sep; 67(5):337-344. PubMed ID: 31204149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations of administrative databases in spine research: a study in obesity.
Golinvaux NS; Bohl DD; Basques BA; Fu MC; Gardner EC; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2923-8. PubMed ID: 24780248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of claim data in the identification and classification of adults with congenital heart diseases in electronic medical records.
Cohen S; Jannot AS; Iserin L; Bonnet D; Burgun A; Escudié JB
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2019 Jan; 112(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 30612895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability in Standard Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Fusion Determined by National Databases.
Joseph JR; Smith BW; Park P
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():236-240. PubMed ID: 27742512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of a combined current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm in classifying cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes.
Wang MC; Laud PW; Macias M; Nattinger AB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(22):1843-8. PubMed ID: 21245779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The validity of administrative data to classify patients with spinal column and cord injuries.
Noonan VK; Thorogood NP; Fingas M; Batke J; Bélanger L; Kwon BK; Dvorak MF
J Neurotrauma; 2013 Feb; 30(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 23002989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of ICD-10 Coding System for Identifying Comorbidities and Infectious Conditions Using Data from a Thai University Hospital Administrative Database.
Rattanaumpawan P; Wongkamhla T; Thamlikitkul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 27396219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the Rate of Revision Discectomies After Primary Discectomy on a National Scale?
Virk SS; Diwan A; Phillips FM; Sandhu H; Khan SN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Nov; 475(11):2752-2762. PubMed ID: 28849429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thirty day postoperative outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
Abt NB; De la Garza-Ramos R; Olorundare IO; McCutcheon BA; Bydon A; Fogelson J; Nassr A; Bydon M
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Apr; 143():126-31. PubMed ID: 26937864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
Martin BI; Lurie JD; Tosteson AN; Deyo RA; Tosteson TD; Weinstein JN; Mirza SK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(9):769-79. PubMed ID: 24525995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of four common lumbar spine diagnoses upon overall health status.
Pahl MA; Brislin B; Boden S; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro A; Hanscom B; Albert TJ
Spine J; 2006; 6(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 16517382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PTSD diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans: comparison of administrative data to chart review.
McCarron KK; Reinhard MJ; Bloeser KJ; Mahan CM; Kang HK
J Trauma Stress; 2014 Oct; 27(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 25322891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
