These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9380375)

  • 1. The influence of a central stimulus on visual field measurements in children from 3.5 to 30 months of age.
    Harvey EM; Dobson V; Narter DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Sep; 74(9):768-74. PubMed ID: 9380375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does rate of stimulus presentation affect measured visual field extent in infants and toddlers?
    Mohan KM; Dobson V; Harvey EM; Delaney SM; Leber NR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 10333186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of flicker rate on measured visual field extent in very young children.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Mohan KM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 78(11):846-52. PubMed ID: 11763259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of stimulus size on measured visual field extent in infants.
    Dobson V; Baldwin MB; Mohan KM; Delaney SM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Oct; 80(10):698-702. PubMed ID: 14560120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus motion increases measured visual field extent in children 3.5 to 30 months of age.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Harvey EM; Mohan KM; Weidenbacher HJ; Leber NR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Feb; 77(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 10701806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic visual fields of one-eyed observers.
    Good GW; Fogt N; Daum KM; Mitchell GL
    Optometry; 2005 May; 76(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 15884418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measured visual field extent varies with peripheral stimulus flicker rate in very young children.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Mohan KM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 82(9):800-6. PubMed ID: 16189489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of the temporal and nasal visual fields during infancy.
    Lewis TL; Maurer D
    Vision Res; 1992 May; 32(5):903-11. PubMed ID: 1604859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual field extent in children 3.5-30 months of age tested with a double-arc LED perimeter.
    Dobson V; Brown AM; Harvey EM; Narter DB
    Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(18):2743-60. PubMed ID: 9775323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of flicker rate on nasal and temporal measured visual field extent in infants.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Mohan KM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):922-8. PubMed ID: 15592116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of visual acuity in the peripheral visual field of human infants: binocular and monocular measurements.
    Sireteanu R; Fronius M; Constantinescu DH
    Vision Res; 1994 Jun; 34(12):1659-71. PubMed ID: 7941374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constriction of the visual field of children after early visual deprivation.
    Bowering ER; Maurer D; Lewis TL; Brent HP
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1997; 34(6):347-56. PubMed ID: 9430061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vision restoration therapy does not benefit from costimulation: A pilot study.
    Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Müller-Oehring EM; Mueller I; Sabel BA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Aug; 29(6):569-84. PubMed ID: 17691030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition.
    Raveendran RN; Krishnan AK
    J Vis Exp; 2020 Jul; (161):. PubMed ID: 32773761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual fields and eye movements in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina).
    Hanke W; Römer R; Dehnhardt G
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2804-14. PubMed ID: 16564067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uniocular and binocular fields of rotation measures: Octopus versus Goldmann.
    Rowe FJ; Hanif S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 249(6):909-19. PubMed ID: 21243371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of monocular deprivation on the visual fields of squirrel monkeys.
    Wilson JR; Nevins CL
    Behav Brain Res; 1991 Aug; 44(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 1751003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monocular and binocular neuronal activity in human visual cortex revealed by electrical brain activity mapping.
    Skrandies W
    Exp Brain Res; 1993; 93(3):516-20. PubMed ID: 8519340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral prism glasses: effects of moving and stationary backgrounds.
    Shen J; Peli E; Bowers AR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 25785533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinetic perimetry assessment of binocular visual field shape and size in young infants.
    Schwartz TL; Dobson V; Sandstrom DJ; van Hof-van Duin J
    Vision Res; 1987; 27(12):2163-75. PubMed ID: 3447364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.