These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9380845)

  • 1. [Technical considerations of a system of phosphor digital radiography and its cost-effectiveness in a radiology center].
    Ferrari G; Cuscianna G; Saguatti G; Musconi V; Monti D; Marcheggiano P; Romagnoli R
    Radiol Med; 1997; 93(1-2):100-8. PubMed ID: 9380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between indicators for the measurement of radiology activity volumes (Italy-USA).
    Cristofaro M; Bibbolino C; Lauria FN; Petrecchia A; Squarcione S; David V
    Radiol Med; 2004 Oct; 108(4):426-38. PubMed ID: 15525896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost of managing digital diagnostic images for a 614-bed hospital.
    Dwyer SJ; Templeton AW; Martin NL; Cook LT; Lee KR; Levine E; Batnitzky S; Preston DF; Rosenthal SJ; Price HI; Anderson WH; Tarlton MA; Faszold S
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Dec; 15(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 12612789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased productivity of a digital imaging system: one hospital's experience.
    Sack D
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 11793559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
    Stockburger WT
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating digital systems: commitment and collaboration.
    Himes JA; Rosenfeld K
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 15259684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elimination of electrostatic discharges in automatic daylight film processor systems. A simple, cost-effective solution. Technical note.
    Asp T; Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 2509205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital vs conventional radiography: cost and revenue analysis.
    Dalla Palma L; Grisi G; Cuttin R; Rimondini A
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1682-92. PubMed ID: 10525891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saving time, improving satisfaction: the impact of a digital radiology system on physician workflow and system efficiency.
    Srinivasan M; Liederman E; Baluyot N; Jacoby R
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 16669596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital x-ray systems. Part 2. An overview of digital radiography concepts and an evaluation of cassetteless DX systems.
    Health Devices; 2001 Nov; 30(11):381-401. PubMed ID: 11770228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Imaging quality of a digital Konica Regius 336 system for thoracic radiology].
    Ostinelli A; Frigerio M; Monti AF; Gelosa S; Tognoli P; Perniola N; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Jun; 99(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 11262825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Costs and performance in roentgen diagnosis--conventional technique versus digital technique].
    Brandt GA; Homburg M; Cimanowski N; Ohmen E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Nov; 7(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 9467031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital imaging system are rapidly introduced in Swedish departments of radiography. This calls for new strategic planning].
    Laurin S; Norberg KA
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(41):4600-1. PubMed ID: 11107746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs. transcription.
    Gale B; Safriel Y; Lukban A; Kalowitz J; Fleischer J; Gordon D
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11302062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Management control and operative budget at a radiology center].
    Ferrari G; Musconi V; Zappi A; Cavina A; Zanetti M
    Radiol Med; 1996 Jun; 91(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 8830367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Materials management system in interventional radiology -- initial experience with a computer-supported program].
    Clevert DA; Jung EM; Reiser M; Rupp N
    Rofo; 2004 Oct; 176(10):1475-80. PubMed ID: 15383981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tale of two CRs: hospital conducts side-by-side test.
    Fawver SD
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 12800561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cost-effectiveness evaluation of a digital radiography system].
    Guillaume L; Joris T; Mandry D; Kammacher L; Claudon M
    J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):963-7. PubMed ID: 17878853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.