These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9381196)

  • 21. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Funding of NIH grant applications: update.
    Mandel HG
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5220):13-4. PubMed ID: 7604271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomedical funding. At NIH, two strikes policy is out.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6182):350. PubMed ID: 24763564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Funding system in the National Institutes of Health.
    Thomas DA
    J Oral Sci; 1998 Sep; 40(3):129-30. PubMed ID: 9838749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Funding of newly submitted NIH grant applications.
    Mandel HG
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5192):1789. PubMed ID: 7997868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):189. PubMed ID: 18845728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A metareview at the NIH.
    Nat Med; 2008 Apr; 14(4):351. PubMed ID: 18391922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
    Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
    Baldwin W; McCardle P
    Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On incentives for innovation.
    Alberts B
    Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NIH plans peer-review overhaul.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 May; 276(5314):888-9. PubMed ID: 9163031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changes to NIH grant system may backfire.
    Karp PD; Sherlock G; Gerlt JA; Sim I; Paulsen I; Babbitt PC; Laderoute K; Hunter L; Sternberg P; Wooley J; Bourne PE
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5905):1187-8. PubMed ID: 19023064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Guidelines for community-based partners for reviewing research grant applications: lessons from the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR) Community Engagement Research Core (CERC).
    Anderson RM; Calhoun K; Choate CB; De Loney EH; Paberzs A; Sampselle CM; Vereen DR; Zimmerman MA
    Clin Transl Sci; 2013 Dec; 6(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 24330687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NIH abandons grant cap, offers new help to younger scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2017 Jun; 356(6343):1108. PubMed ID: 28619891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Senator questions $2m NIH grant to disgraced psychiatric researcher.
    Roehr B
    BMJ; 2012 Jun; 344():e3880. PubMed ID: 22661741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.