These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9383087)

  • 1. Average dominance for polygenes: drawbacks of regression estimates.
    Caballero A; Keightley PD; Turelli M
    Genetics; 1997 Nov; 147(3):1487-90. PubMed ID: 9383087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The nature of quantitative genetic variation in drosophila. II. Average dominance of abdominal bristle polygenes.
    Frankham R
    Aust J Biol Sci; 1974 Dec; 27(6):683-6. PubMed ID: 4219275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population.
    Mukai T; Yamaguchi O
    Genetics; 1974 Feb; 76(2):339-66. PubMed ID: 4207116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. V. Coupling-repulsion effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability.
    Mukai T; Yamazaki T
    Genetics; 1968 Aug; 59(4):513-35. PubMed ID: 5708299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 8. Natural selection on the degree of dominance of viability polygenes.
    Mukai T
    Genetics; 1969 Oct; 63(2):467-78. PubMed ID: 5366220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.
    Simmons MJ; Crow JF
    Annu Rev Genet; 1977; 11():49-78. PubMed ID: 413473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. OVERDOMINANCE OF SPONTANEOUS MUTANT POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY IN HOMOZYGOUS GENETIC BACKGROUND.
    MUKAI T; CHIGUSA S; YOSHIKAWA I
    Genetics; 1964 Oct; 50(4):711-5. PubMed ID: 14221876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modification of dominance by selection in the homozygote.
    Thompson JN; Thoday JM
    Heredity (Edinb); 1972 Dec; 29(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 4630535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between homozygous viability and average dominance in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Morton NE; Chung CS; Friedman LD; Morton NT; Miki C; Yee S
    Genetics; 1968 Nov; 60(3):601-14. PubMed ID: 5728743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Mukai T; Chigusa SI; Mettler LE; Crow JF
    Genetics; 1972 Oct; 72(2):335-55. PubMed ID: 4630587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection for dominance of hairy-wing (Hw) in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Dominance at different levels of phenotype.
    Ohh BK; Sheldon BL
    Genetics; 1970 Nov; 66(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 5519654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Fry JD; Nuzhdin SV
    Genetics; 2003 Apr; 163(4):1357-64. PubMed ID: 12702680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gene substitutions and geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kessler S; Kraemer HC
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 May; 89(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 807604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chavarrías D; López-Fanjul C; García-Dorado A
    Genetics; 2001 Jun; 158(2):681-93. PubMed ID: 11404332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Widespread correlations between dominance and homozygous effects of mutations: implications for theories of dominance.
    Phadnis N; Fry JD
    Genetics; 2005 Sep; 171(1):385-92. PubMed ID: 15972465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Dominance effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability in heterozygous genetic backgrounds.
    Mukai T; Chigusa S; Yoshikawa I
    Genetics; 1965 Sep; 52(3):493-501. PubMed ID: 5863900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetical variation for enzyme activity in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Dominance relationships for alcohol dehydrogenase activity.
    Birley AJ; Barnes BW
    Heredity (Edinb); 1975 Aug; 35(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 810464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic polymorphism and high detrimental load in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster from cellar and vineyard.
    González A; Ménsua JL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1987 Oct; 59 ( Pt 2)():227-36. PubMed ID: 3119525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The genetic variability of third chromosomes in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Watanabe TK; Yamaguchi O; Mukai T
    Genetics; 1976 Jan; 82(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 814043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature of reversion of a dominant gene of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Denell RE
    Mutat Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 4626134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.