249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9383269)
1. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1997 Dec; 61(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 9383269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Mar; 56(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 7750022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD.
Franck H; Munz M; Scherrer M; v Lilienfeld-Toal H
Rheumatol Int; 1995; 15(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8835296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total body and regional bone mineral densitometry (BMD) and soft tissue measurements: correlations of BMD parameter to lumbar spine and hip.
Franck H; Munz M
Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Aug; 67(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 10920214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans.
Faulkner KG; Genant HK; McClung M
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Jan; 56(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 7796342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term change in the bone mineral density of adults with adult onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency in response to short or long-term GH replacement therapy.
Rahim A; Holmes SJ; Adams JE; Shalet SM
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1998 Apr; 48(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 9640413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro.
Ruetsche AG; Lippuner K; Jaeger P; Casez JP
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 10871910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam.
Mazess RB; Hanson JA; Payne R; Nord R; Wilson M
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 10793875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing short-term precision of dual X-ray bone absorptiometry (DXA) of spine and femur.
Engelke K; Glüer CC; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Jan; 56(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 7796341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Associations between objectively-measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with bone mineral density in adults and older adults, the NHANES study.
Chastin SF; Mandrichenko O; Helbostadt JL; Skelton DA
Bone; 2014 Jul; 64():254-62. PubMed ID: 24735973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements.
Petley GW; Taylor PA; Murrills AJ; Dennison E; Pearson G; Cooper C
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 11095170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.
Hamdy R; Kiebzak GM; Seier E; Watts NB
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1772-80. PubMed ID: 17019523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Choi D; Kim DY; Han CS; Kim S; Bok HS; Huh W; Ko JW; Hong SH
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19924413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.
Pouilles JM; Tremollieres F; Todorovsky N; Ribot C
J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Sep; 6(9):997-1002. PubMed ID: 1789144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
