105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 938347)
1. Threshold improvement and acoustic gain with hearing aids.
Walden BE; Kasten RN
Audiology; 1976; 15(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 938347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
Garstecki DC; Bode DL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement in hearing aid selection.
Rappaport BZ; Tait CA
Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Mar; 102(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 1267684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
Plomp R
J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing aid gain-setting performance of experienced users.
Reid L; Smiarowski RA; McPherson LT
Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Apr; 103(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 849197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
Plomp R
Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
Hansen M
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fitting range of the BAHA Intenso.
Bosman AJ; Snik FM; Mylanus EA; Cremers WR
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):346-52. PubMed ID: 19925342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The benefit of hearing aids: influence of hearing loss and age.
Welzl-Müller K; Stephan K
Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 3749780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
