These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 938348)

  • 21. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
    Luts H; Maj JB; Soede W; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].
    Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 27299893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interaction between electric and acoustic cues in diotic condition for speech perception in quiet and noise by cochlear implantees.
    Richard C; Ferrary E; Borel S; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 22158018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of hearing aid release time and presentation level on speech perception in noise in elderly individuals with hearing loss.
    Pottackal Mathai J; Mohammed H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):671-677. PubMed ID: 27571783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users.
    Miller CW; Bates E; Brennan M
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):305-12. PubMed ID: 26938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.