These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 938348)
41. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings. Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction. Saunders GH; Forsline A Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings. Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dittberner AB Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid. Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids]. Hoppe U; Hast A HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 27921115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The effect of spatial separation of speech and noise sources on the optimal setting of the master hearing aid. Lawrence DW; Franks JR J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 738914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes]. Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of age on speech intelligibility in babble noise. Cerny L; Vokral J; Dlouha O Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2018; 78(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 30019705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The performance-perceptual test and its relationship to unaided reported handicap. Saunders GH; Forsline A; Fausti SA Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 15064656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio. McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Binaural hearing spectacles with "no mould" by acoustic trauma. Lund O; Høyvik H Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():113-5. PubMed ID: 287318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario. Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss. Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]