These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 938348)

  • 61. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid.
    Armstrong M; Pegg P; James C; Blamey P
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S140-1. PubMed ID: 9391635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Compression-dependent differences in hearing aid gain between speech and nonspeech input signals.
    Henning RW; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 16079635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Clinical application of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation].
    Xia Y; Zhang H; Gong SS; Wang DN; Zheng YL; Li YL; Dong BY; Han DM
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):640-3. PubMed ID: 24195819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A tutorial on complex sound fields for audiometric testing.
    Ghent RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15715065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Audiometric test battery for presbycusis].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2020 Mar; 68(3):164-170. PubMed ID: 31549193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. An audiovisual test of hearing disability using free-field sentences in noise.
    Day GA; Browning GG; Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1988 Aug; 22(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 3167256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Input-output function of the acoustic reflex and objective hearing aid evaluation.
    Kiessling J
    Audiology; 1980; 19(6):480-94. PubMed ID: 7425953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Visual reinforcement audiometry. Comparison of loudspeaker arrangements.
    Magnusson L; Börjesson E; Axelsson AC
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 9428034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level.
    Olsen SØ; Nielsen LH; Lantz J; Brännström KJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 23506668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Comparison of certain measures of speech and noise level.
    Ludvigsen C
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 1585126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Response to Olsen et al.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Van Haneghan J; Adams E; Moore R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 23506669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) and the French Society of Audiology (SFA) for Speech-in-Noise Testing in Adults.
    Joly CA; Reynard P; Mezzi K; Bakhos D; Bergeron F; Bonnard D; Borel S; Bouccara D; Coez A; Dejean F; Del Rio M; Leclercq F; Henrion P; Marx M; Mom T; Mosnier I; Potier M; Renard C; Roy T; Sterkers-Artières F; Venail F; Verheyden P; Veuillet E; Vincent C; Thai-Van H
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2022 Jan; 139(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 34140263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].
    Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 27299893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Speech audiometry and fitting of hearing aids in noise.
    Niemeyer W
    Audiology; 1976; 15(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 938348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.