These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9383696)

  • 1. Anomalies in the measurement of changes in total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight change.
    Tothill P; Hannan WJ; Cowen S; Freeman CP
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Nov; 12(11):1908-21. PubMed ID: 9383696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.
    Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Yang SO; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Nelson DL; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1425-7. PubMed ID: 7817826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.
    Mazess RB; Trempe JA; Bisek JP; Hanson JA; Hans D
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Aug; 6(8):799-806. PubMed ID: 1785372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo whole body and appendicular bone mineral density in rats: a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry study.
    Karahan S; Kincaid SA; Lauten SD; Wright JC
    Comp Med; 2002 Apr; 52(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 12022394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulated change in body fatness affects Hologic QDR 4500A whole body and central DXA bone measures.
    Evans EM; Mojtahedi MC; Kessinger RB; Misic MM
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 16931350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.
    Laskey MA; Lyttle KD; Flaxman ME; Barber RW
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jan; 46(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1559506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers.
    Peel NF; Eastell R
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision and accuracy of a transportable dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry unit for bone mineral measurements in guinea pigs.
    Fink C; Cooper HJ; Huebner JL; Guilak F; Kraus VB
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Mar; 70(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11907713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry studies of bone mineral status in newborn infants.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ; Chesney RW; Carlson SE
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jul; 11(7):997-102. PubMed ID: 8797121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision of regional bone mineral measurements obtained from total-body scans.
    LeBlanc AD; Schneider VS; Engelbretson DA; Evans HJ
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2295939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
    Nuti R; Martini G; Righi G; Frediani B; Turchetti V
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages.
    Van Loan MD; Keim NL; Berg K; Mayclin PL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Apr; 27(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 7791591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of weight change on total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: results from a clinical trial.
    Blake GM; Herd RJ; Patel R; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 11199186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: an in vitro study.
    Tabensky AD; Williams J; DeLuca V; Briganti E; Seeman E
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1981-8. PubMed ID: 8970902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of spine bone mineral density in ovariectomized rats using DXA.
    Yamauchi H; Kushida K; Yamazaki K; Inoue T
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 7484278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total body calcium and bone mineral content: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with neutron activation analysis.
    Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ; Hergenroeder A; Perez M; Abrams S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jun; 11(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 8725182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements: dual-energy X-rays versus gadolinium 153.
    Russell-Aulet M; Wang J; Thornton J; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Apr; 6(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 1858524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.