These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9383701)

  • 1. QCT, the most accurate method of measuring bone mineral density?
    Weigert JM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Nov; 12(11):1954-5. PubMed ID: 9383701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
    Guglielmi G
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 20(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 8536745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteoporosis and bone mineral density.
    Siaw EA; Vanderford V
    Radiol Technol; 2001; 72(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 11269825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Measurement of vertebral bone density. Quantitative tomodensitometry or dual-photon absorptiometry?].
    Bergot C; Laval-Jeantet AM; Laval-Jeantet MH; Kuntz D
    J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 74(4):195-204. PubMed ID: 8505715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing osteoporosis: CT's quantitative advantage.
    Genant HK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1985 Aug; 7(8):52-7. PubMed ID: 11540861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of two noninvasive measurement methods for determining central osteoporosis taking into consideration the ash content].
    von Stremple A; Prokopp M; Flindt C
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8448227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DXA vs QCT: in vitro and in vivo studies.
    Masala S; Tarantino U; Marinetti A; Aiello N; Fiori R; Sorge RP; Simonetti G
    Acta Diabetol; 2003 Oct; 40 Suppl 1():S86-8. PubMed ID: 14618442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The spine deformity index in osteoporosis is not related to bone mineral and ultrasound measurements.
    Bernecker P; Pietschmann P; Winkelbauer F; Krexner E; Resch H; Willvonseder R
    Br J Radiol; 1992 May; 65(773):393-6. PubMed ID: 1611418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Bone density measurements and their indications].
    Dambacher MA; Rüegsegger P
    Orthopade; 1994 Feb; 23(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 8134096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of optimal measuring site and index by QDR4500A for postmenopausal bone loss].
    Deng X; Liao E; Wu X; Zhou Z; Chao C; Wu H
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1997; 22(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 9868057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quantitative X-ray computed tomography].
    Wakamatsu H; Matsuyama T; Yabana T
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Jun; 56(6):1479-83. PubMed ID: 9648469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of bone densitometry measurements of the central skeleton in post-menopausal women with and without vertebral fracture.
    Duboeuf F; Jergas M; Schott AM; Wu CY; Glüer CC; Genant HK
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):747-53. PubMed ID: 7640931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications.
    Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):583-6. PubMed ID: 1508094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A comparison between quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy densitometry in the study of patients at risk for postmenopausal osteoporosis].
    La Fianza A; Campani R; Dore R; Torretta L; Bertoni G
    Radiol Med; 1992; 84(1-2):11-4. PubMed ID: 1509125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone mass measurement: how, where, when and why?
    Delmas PD
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38 Suppl 2():70-6. PubMed ID: 8252108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative studies with quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on bone density in renal osteopathy].
    Funke M; Mäurer J; Grabbe E; Scheler F
    Rofo; 1992 Aug; 157(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 1515623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of calcaneal ultrasonic assessment to the evaluation of postmenopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
    Blanckaert F; Cortet B; Coquerelle P; Flipo RM; Duquesnoy B; Marchandise X; Delcambre B
    Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1997 May; 64(5):305-13. PubMed ID: 9190004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.