218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9383856)
21. Influence of screw augmentation in posterior dynamic and rigid stabilization systems in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: a biomechanical cadaveric study.
Hoppe S; Loosli Y; Baumgartner D; Heini P; Benneker L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E384-9. PubMed ID: 24384660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Sansur CA; Caffes NM; Ibrahimi DM; Pratt NL; Lewis EM; Murgatroyd AA; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 27176113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.
Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A
World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vivo study of pedicle screw augmentation using bioactive glass in osteoporosis sheep.
Li Y; Cheng H; Liu ZC; Wu JW; Yu L; Zang Y; He Q; Lei W; Wu ZX
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jun; 26(4):E118-23. PubMed ID: 23079719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of an expandable pedicle screw in osteoporotic spine in sheep.
Wan S; Lei W; Wu Z; Liu D; Gao M; Fu S
Eur Spine J; 2010 Dec; 19(12):2122-9. PubMed ID: 20577766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Asazuma T; Nemoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 26161515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength.
Myers BS; Belmont PJ; Richardson WJ; Yu JR; Harper KD; Nightingale RW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Sep; 21(17):1962-8. PubMed ID: 8883195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of pedicle screw fit. An in vitro study.
Brantley AG; Mayfield JK; Koeneman JB; Clark KR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Aug; 19(15):1752-8. PubMed ID: 7973971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the Pull-Out Strength between a Novel Micro-Dynamic Pedicle Screw and a Traditional Pedicle Screw in Lumbar Spine.
Qian L; Chen W; Li P; Qu D; Liang W; Zheng M; Ouyang J
Orthop Surg; 2020 Aug; 12(4):1285-1292. PubMed ID: 32776487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Biomechanical Properties of Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined With Trajectory Bone Cement Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebrae.
Fan HT; Zhang RJ; Shen CL; Dong FL; Li Y; Song PW; Gong C; Wang YJ
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 26889991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Augmentation of pedicle screw stability with calcium sulfate cement in osteoporotic sheep: biomechanical and screw-bone interfacial evaluation.
Liu D; Lei W; Wu ZX; Gao MX; Wan SY; Fu SC; Shi L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 20844452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.
Liu D; Sheng J; Luo Y; Huang C; Wu HH; Zhou JJ; Zhang XJ; Zheng W
Spine J; 2018 Sep; 18(9):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 29567517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pedicle screws and bone mineral density.
Kumano K; Hirabayashi S; Ogawa Y; Aota Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 May; 19(10):1157-61. PubMed ID: 8059273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhancing pedicle screw fixation in the aging spine with a novel bioactive bone cement: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Zhu Q; Kingwell S; Li Z; Pan H; Lu WW; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):E1030-7. PubMed ID: 22531472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An experimental study on the interface strength between titanium mesh cage and vertebra in reference to vertebral bone mineral density.
Hasegawa K; Abe M; Washio T; Hara T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):957-63. PubMed ID: 11317121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Biomechanical effects of iliac screw plates on stability of lumbo-iliac fixation construct].
Wang L; Pan H; Yu B; Xie C; Xu Y; Zheng Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 23879102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength.
Weiser L; Huber G; Sellenschloh K; Viezens L; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Lehmann W
Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2891-2897. PubMed ID: 28391382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preoperative estimation of screw fixation strength in vertebral bodies.
Eysel P; Schwitalle M; Oberstein A; Rompe JD; Hopf C; Küllmer K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jan; 23(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 9474722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone Density at the Entry Point Correlates With the Trabecular Bone of the Thoracolumbar Vertebral Bodies - Quantitative Computed Tomography Study.
Glinkowski WM; Narloch J
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):367-373. PubMed ID: 30482496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
