These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9387832)
1. "En masse" retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with anterior headgear. Güray E; Orhan M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 9387832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study. Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage. Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report. Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques. Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study. Hedayati Z; Shomali M Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. En masse retraction of the anterior teeth using a modified bidimensional technique. Giancotti A; Mozzicato P; Greco M J Clin Orthod; 2012 May; 46(5):267-73. PubMed ID: 22785037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion. de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An unusual case of invasive cervical resorption after piezosurgery-assisted en masse retraction. Tunçer Nİ; Köseoğlu-Seçgin C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jul; 156(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31256827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II correction with the modified sagittal appliance and maxillary second molar extraction. Aras A Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 10961784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes. Kuroda S; Yamada K; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19268827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Zygomatic anchorage for en masse retraction in the treatment of severe Class II division 1. Erverdi N; Acar A Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 15898393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes. Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions. Quaglio CL; de Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Janson G; Henriques JF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):768-74. PubMed ID: 21640883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique. Mo SS; Kim SH; Sung SJ; Chung KR; Chun YS; Kook YA; Nelson G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e183-91. PubMed ID: 21300229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of severe Class II Division 1 deep overbite malocclusion without extractions in an adult. Horiuchi Y; Horiuchi M; Soma K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):S121-9. PubMed ID: 18407019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extraction treatment of a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with anterior open bite with headgear and vertical elastics. Gehring D; Freeseman M; Frazier M; Southard K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 9563359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonextraction treatment of upper canine-premolar transposition in an adult patient. Kuroda S; Kuroda Y Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 15898391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]