These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9387985)
1. Acoustical and electrical biasing of the cochlea partition. Effects on the acoustic two tone distortions f2-f1 and 2f1-f2. Frank G; Kössl M Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):57-68. PubMed ID: 9387985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier. Frank G; Kössl M Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 8880185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state? Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea. Ren T Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations. Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC J Neurophysiol; 1997 May; 77(5):2385-99. PubMed ID: 9163365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea. Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2. Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea. Cooper NP; Rhode WS J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2). Gibian GL; Kim DO Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra. Lai J; Bartlett EL Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi. Kössl M Hear Res; 1994 Jan; 72(1-2):59-72. PubMed ID: 8150746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Kim DO Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Further studies on the mechanics of the cochlear partition in the mustached bat. II. A second cochlear frequency map derived from acoustic distortion products. Kössl M; Vater M Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):78-86. PubMed ID: 8789813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. Abdala C J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modulation of hair cell voltage responses to tones by low-frequency biasing of the basilar membrane in the guinea pig cochlea. Russell IJ; Kössl M J Neurosci; 1992 May; 12(5):1587-601. PubMed ID: 1578257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic. Henry KR Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1-f2 distortion generated in the cochlea. Kemp DT; Brown AM Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6706861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biasing of the summating potentials. Durrant JD; Gans D Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(1-2):13-8. PubMed ID: 1080943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]