52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9388793)
1. Understanding mammography intention and utilization among women in an inner city public hospital clinic.
Montaño DE; Thompson B; Taylor VM; Mahloch J
Prev Med; 1997; 26(6):817-24. PubMed ID: 9388793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting mammography behavior and intention among Korean women.
Ham OK
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2006 Jan; 33(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16470239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.
Maxwell CJ; Bancej CM; Snider J
CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 11232132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography in women > or = 50 years of age. Predisposing and enabling characteristics.
Miller AM; Champion VL
Cancer Nurs; 1993 Aug; 16(4):260-9. PubMed ID: 8402602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The intention of future mammography screening among Korean women.
Ham OK
J Community Health Nurs; 2005; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15695192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What predicts a Cypriot woman's decision to obtain or not obtain a screening mammogram? Implications for the promotion of screening mammography in Cyprus.
Tolma EL; Reininger BM; Ureda J
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Apr; 15(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16523012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years.
Slater JS; Henly GA; Ha CN; Malone ME; Nyman JA; Diaz S; McGovern PG
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Oct; 14(10):2346-52. PubMed ID: 16214915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of factors affecting repeat mammography screening of low-income Mexican American women.
Lopez-McKee G; McNeill JA; Bader J; Morales P
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2008 Nov; 35(6):941-7. PubMed ID: 18980925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using the theory of reasoned action to determine physicians' intention to measure body mass index in children and adolescents.
Khanna R; Kavookjian J; Scott VG; Kamal KM; Miller LA; Neal WA
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2009 Jun; 5(2):170-81. PubMed ID: 19524864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beliefs, recommendations and intentions are important explanatory factors of mammography screening behavior among Muslim Arab women in Israel.
Soskolne V; Marie S; Manor O
Health Educ Res; 2007 Oct; 22(5):665-76. PubMed ID: 17138612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communication between older women and physicians: preliminary implications for satisfaction and intention to have mammography.
Liang W; Kasman D; Wang JH; Yuan EH; Mandelblatt JS
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Dec; 64(1-3):387-92. PubMed ID: 16872797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of the Champion's Health Belief Model Scale among Lithuanian women.
Zelviene A; Bogusevicius A
Cancer Nurs; 2007; 30(3):E20-8. PubMed ID: 17510578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women.
Armstrong K; Long JA; Shea JA
Prev Med; 2004 Jun; 38(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 15193895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County.
Koval AE; Riganti AA; Foley KL
N C Med J; 2006; 67(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16550986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1990-1994 National Health Interview Surveys.
Rakowski W; Clark MA; Ehrich B
Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):487-95. PubMed ID: 10600429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attitudes and beliefs toward mammography among women using an urban public hospital.
Thompson B; Montaño DE; Mahloch J; Mullen M; Taylor V
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 1997 May; 8(2):186-201. PubMed ID: 9114627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention.
Tolma EL; Reininger BM; Evans A; Ureda J
Health Educ Behav; 2006 Apr; 33(2):233-51. PubMed ID: 16531515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
