These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9389255)

  • 1. Meta-analysis: greater than the sum of its parts?
    Souter MJ; Signorini DF
    Br J Anaesth; 1997 Oct; 79(4):420-1. PubMed ID: 9389255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis: should it be more than the sum of its parts?
    Herbolsheimer P; Swain SM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Dec; 102(24):1817-9. PubMed ID: 21098760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading systems for cost-effectiveness studies: is the whole greater than the sum of the parts?
    Stearns SC; Drummond M
    Med Care; 2003 Jan; 41(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12544536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis of clinical studies: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
    Louis TA
    Transfusion; 1993 Sep; 33(9):698-700. PubMed ID: 8212112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analyses of randomised trials: when the whole is more than just the sum of the parts.
    Parmar MK; Stewart LA; Altman DG
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Aug; 74(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 8761361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not PEDro's bias: summary quality scores can be used in meta-analysis.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):940-1. PubMed ID: 23651766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochrane's risk of bias tool in the context of psychotherapy outcome research.
    Munder T; Barth J
    Psychother Res; 2018 May; 28(3):347-355. PubMed ID: 29224503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Stewart LA; Parmar MK; Tierney JF
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):59; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing results from meta-analyses vs large trials.
    LeLorier J; Gregoire G
    JAMA; 1998 Aug; 280(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 9707137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Prospectively identified trials could be used for comparison with meta-analyses.
    Langhorne P
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the criteria used for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing adverse effects.
    Bonovas S; Lytras T; Nikolopoulos G
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 30(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 25773753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust.
    Bero L
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):e2005972. PubMed ID: 29608562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. More than the sum of its parts: meta-analysis and its potential to discover sources of heterogeneity in psychosomatic medicine.
    Tak LM; Meijer A; Manoharan A; de Jonge P; Rosmalen JG
    Psychosom Med; 2010 Apr; 72(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 20395625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sir? Is that bias?
    Reilly D
    Homeopathy; 2006 Jan; 95(1):55. PubMed ID: 16399259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Egger M; Schneider M; Davey Smith G
    BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7125):140-4. PubMed ID: 9462324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
    da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.