These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9389817)
1. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a report on 1,118 cases. Kim SH; Shin CJ; Kim JG; Moon SY; Lee JY; Chang YS Fertil Steril; 1997 Nov; 68(5):865-70. PubMed ID: 9389817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Macroscopic tuboplasty: reversal of female sterilization. Gupta I; Sawhney H; Mahajan U Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 2099726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Government-funding program on reversal of tubal sterilization. Bai BC; Park CM; Kwak HM; Whang YW Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Mar; 18(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 1627062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microsurgical repair of the fallopian tubes. O'Brien BM; Sully L; Jolly HF; Morrison WA Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Apr; 53(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 6576766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization. Chang YS; Kim JG Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Dec; 12(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 3827723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The choice of sterilizing procedure according to its potential reversibility with microsurgery. Cantor B; Riggall FC Fertil Steril; 1979 Jan; 31(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 421923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A report on 387 cases of microsurgical tubal reversals. Kim JD; Kim KS; Doo JK; Rhyeu CH Fertil Steril; 1997 Nov; 68(5):875-80. PubMed ID: 9389819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: the role of tubal length. Silber SJ; Cohen R Fertil Steril; 1980 Jun; 33(6):598-601. PubMed ID: 7380046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pregnancy after fimbriectomy reversal: results of microsurgery augmented by gamete intrafallopian tube transfer and embryo transfer. Novy MJ; Hickok LR; Patton PE; Craemer MJ; Wolf DP Fertil Steril; 1991 Dec; 56(6):1166-8. PubMed ID: 1743339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing the outcome of microsurgical tubal ligation reversals. Seiler JC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jun; 146(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 6859139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tubal anastomosis: pregnancy success following reversal of Falope ring or monopolar cautery sterilization. Rock JA; Guzick DS; Katz E; Zacur HA; King TM Fertil Steril; 1987 Jul; 48(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 3595909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis. Yoon TK; Sung HR; Cha SH; Lee CN; Cha KY Fertil Steril; 1997 Jan; 67(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 8986677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microsurgical tubal anastomoses performed as an outpatient procedure by minilaparotomy are less expensive and as safe as those performed as an inpatient procedure. Slowey MJ; Coddington CC Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):492-5. PubMed ID: 9531884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]