120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9390123)
1. Cervical smear histories of 585 women with biopsy-proven carcinoma in situ.
Bergeron C; Debaque H; Ayivi J; Amaizo S; Fagnani F
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1676-80. PubMed ID: 9390123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Hall S; Lörincz A; Shah F; Sherman ME; Abbas F; Paull G; Kurman RJ; Shah KV
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
Roche DH; Spicer N
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective evaluation of cervical smears in women harbouring biopsy proven SIL.
Grabowska H; Nordesjö LO; Matuszkiewicz L
Pol J Pathol; 1998; 49(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 9810175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pap smear screening in an urban STD clinic. Yield of screening and predictors of abnormalities.
Shlay JC; McGill WL; Masloboeva HA; Douglas JM
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Oct; 25(9):468-75. PubMed ID: 9800258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False positive cervicovaginal cytology. A follow-up study.
Anderson MB; Jones BA
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1697-700. PubMed ID: 9390126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Review of cervical smears in a gynaecologic department after a period of ten years under the consideration of colposcopic findings(author's transl)].
Michalzik K
Arch Gynakol; 1975; 218(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 1174025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: screening and diagnostic errors in Papanicolaou smears.
Ruba S; Schoolland M; Allpress S; Sterrett G
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):280-7. PubMed ID: 15376198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the 5-year review of negative cervical smears in patients with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Tabbara SO; Sidawy MK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jul; 15(1):7-10; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 8807245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis.
Lee KR; Manna EA; St John T
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
