These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9390125)

  • 1. Cervical cytologic smear false negative fraction. Reduction in a small community hospital.
    Wang SE; Ritchie MJ; Atkinson BF
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1690-6. PubMed ID: 9390125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The false-negative fraction: a statistical method to measure the efficacy of cervical smear screening laboratories.
    Dolinar J; Ollayos CW; Tellado M; Ali I; Stevens A; Paquette C; Brodbelt S
    Mil Med; 1999 Jun; 164(6):410-1. PubMed ID: 10377709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inadequate cervical smear: what do we do?
    Phadnis SV; Doshi JS; Ogunnaike OO; Padwick ML; Sanusi FA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 15842215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The false negative smear: an instrumental error?
    Rubio CA
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):500-1. PubMed ID: 269598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Déjà vu in pap testing: return of the 5% false-negative fraction and the zero-error rate.
    Renshaw AA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jun; 26(6):343-4. PubMed ID: 12112821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Pap smear revisited. Controversies and recent developments.
    Zuna RE
    Postgrad Med; 1984 Nov; 76(6):36-40, 42-3, 46. PubMed ID: 6494079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internal quality assurance in cervical cytology one laboratory's experience.
    Cross PA
    Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8833871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
    Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An economic model for comparing alternative policies for cervical cytologic smear screening.
    Kaminsky FC; Burke RJ; Haberle KR; Mullins DL
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 7887070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of moderate and severe inflammation on class I Papanicolaou smear.
    Lawley TB; Lee RB; Kapela R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):997-9. PubMed ID: 2234731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reproducibility of cytologic diagnosis in a sample of cervical cancer screening centers in Mexico.
    Lazcano-Ponce EC; Alonso de Ruíz P; López-Carrillo L; Nájera-Aguilar P; Avila-Ceniceros R; Escandón-Romero C; Cisneros MT; Hernández-Avila M
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 9100754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical analysis of data in cervical cytology from the viewpoint of total quality management.
    Kaminsky FC; Burke RJ; Haberle KR; Mullins DL
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 7887069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnosis of cervix dysplasia and electroconization].
    Brzóska J; Gerstenstein Z; Uszyński M
    Ginekol Pol; 1983 Mar; 54(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 6884810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.