92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9390126)
1. False positive cervicovaginal cytology. A follow-up study.
Anderson MB; Jones BA
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1697-700. PubMed ID: 9390126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical smear histories of 585 women with biopsy-proven carcinoma in situ.
Bergeron C; Debaque H; Ayivi J; Amaizo S; Fagnani F
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1676-80. PubMed ID: 9390123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytodiagnostic problems in cervicovaginal smears from symptomatic breast cancer patients on tamoxifen therapy.
Ajit D; Gavas S; Jagtap S; Chinoy RF
Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 19697721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings.
Costa MJ; Kenny MB; Naib ZM
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 1994621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytologic/histologic correlation for quality control in cervicovaginal cytology. Experience with 1,582 paired cases.
Joste NE; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 103(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 7817940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discordance between uterine cervical cytology and biopsy: results and etiologies of a one-year audit.
Tzeng JE; Chen JT; Chang MC; Ho WL
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 1999 Jan; 15(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 10063792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of cervicovaginal cytology in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma following radiotherapy.
Shield PW; Wright RG; Free K; Daunter B
Gynecol Oncol; 1991 Jun; 41(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 1869099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appropriate follow-up interval for biopsy confirmation of squamous intraepithelial lesions diagnosed by cervical smear cytology.
Renshaw AA; Granter SR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Sep; 108(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 9291454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Hall S; Lörincz A; Shah F; Sherman ME; Abbas F; Paull G; Kurman RJ; Shah KV
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated screening of gynecologic cytology: a comparison of results.
Alameda F; Pijuan L; Lloveras B; Soler I; Romero E; Carreras R; Serrano S
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2011 Feb; 33(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 22125843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectrum of cytologic changes in pregnancy. A review of 100 abnormal cervicovaginal smears, with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls.
Pisharodi LR; Jovanoska S
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(5):905-8. PubMed ID: 7571968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gain of the 3q26 region in cervicovaginal liquid-based pap preparations is associated with squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma.
Caraway NP; Khanna A; Dawlett M; Guo M; Guo N; Lin E; Katz RL
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18433848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False positive diagnosis in conventional and liquid-based cervical specimens.
Mount S; Harmon M; Eltabbakh G; Uyar D; Leiman G
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 15192952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
