These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9390142)

  • 1. Application of the CytoRich monolayer preparation system for cervical cytology. A prelude to automated primary screening.
    Takahashi M; Naito M
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1785-9. PubMed ID: 9390142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the CytoRich technique for cervical smears.
    Stevens MW; Nespolon WW; Milne AJ; Rowland R
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Mar; 18(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 9523146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method.
    Johnson T; Maksem JA; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Klock LA; Eatwell L
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 10649517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology.
    Howell LP; Davis RL; Belk TI; Agdigos R; Lowe J
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 9479336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site.
    Bishop JW
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of monolayer preparations for cervical cytology: emphasis on suboptimal specimens.
    Vassilakos P; Cossali D; Albe X; Alonso L; Hohener R; Puget E
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 8669185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
    Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical trials of the CytoRich specimen-preparation device for cervical cytology. Preliminary results.
    Wilbur DC; Facik MS; Rutkowski MA; Mulford DK; Atkison KM
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9022722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening? Overview and evaluation of systems available.
    McGoogan E; Reith A
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 8604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the CytoRich slide preparation process.
    Laverty CR; Farnsworth A; Thurloe JK; Grieves A; Bowditch R
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9196807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
    Vassilakos P; Griffin S; Megevand E; Campana A
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
    Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of a manual method of liquid-based cervical cytology.
    Kavatkar AN; Nagwanshi CA; Dabak SM
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2008; 51(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 18603678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.
    Pacheco MC; Conley RC; Pennington DW; Bishop JW
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 18833820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cell surplus on sampling devices after routine cervical cytologic smears. A study of residual cell populations.
    Goodman A; Hutchinson ML
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8728075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Comparison of monolayers to conventional smears.
    Sprenger E; Schwarzmann P; Kirkpatrick M; Fox W; Heinzerling RH; Geyer JW; Knesel EA
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 8604579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
    Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cytological screening of uterine cervical cancer by samples in liquid medium (CytoRich). Preliminary study of a series of 111 292 patients].
    Saurel J; Rabreau M; Landi M; Bondu C; Montoya G; Morancé C; Auber M; Percheron N; Santa-Maria M; Bec M; Berteau MJ; Muller E; Gominet C; Besserves S; Thomas E
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Dec; 27(12):853-7. PubMed ID: 10676042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.