These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9390292)

  • 1. The native sequence determines sidechain packing in a protein, but does optimal sidechain packing determine the native sequence?
    Koehl P; Delarue M
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1997; ():198-209. PubMed ID: 9390292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity.
    Koehl P; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Nov; 293(5):1161-81. PubMed ID: 10547293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational design of a single amino acid sequence that can switch between two distinct protein folds.
    Ambroggio XI; Kuhlman B
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Feb; 128(4):1154-61. PubMed ID: 16433531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined multiple sequence reduced protein model approach to predict the tertiary structure of small proteins.
    Ortiz AR; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1998; ():377-88. PubMed ID: 9697197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Native atomic burials, supplemented by physically motivated hydrogen bond constraints, contain sufficient information to determine the tertiary structure of small globular proteins.
    Pereira de Araújo AF; Gomes AL; Bursztyn AA; Shakhnovich EI
    Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):971-83. PubMed ID: 17847091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinetics of protein folding. A lattice model study of the requirements for folding to the native state.
    Sali A; Shakhnovich E; Karplus M
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Feb; 235(5):1614-36. PubMed ID: 8107095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
    Fromer M; Yanover C
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme.
    Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 1994 Apr; 18(4):338-52. PubMed ID: 8208726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic protein design with all atom force-fields by exact and heuristic optimization.
    Wernisch L; Hery S; Wodak SJ
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):713-36. PubMed ID: 10966779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scoring predictive models using a reduced representation of proteins: model and energy definition.
    Fogolari F; Pieri L; Dovier A; Bortolussi L; Giugliarelli G; Corazza A; Esposito G; Viglino P
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Mar; 7():15. PubMed ID: 17378941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Excluded volume in protein side-chain packing.
    Kussell E; Shimada J; Shakhnovich EI
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Aug; 311(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 11469867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An algorithm for prediction of structural elements in small proteins.
    Kolinski A; Skolnick J; Godzik A
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1996; ():446-60. PubMed ID: 9390250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. II. Application to protein A, ROP, and crambin.
    Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 1994 Apr; 18(4):353-66. PubMed ID: 8208727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Packing as a structural basis of protein stability: understanding mutant properties from wildtype structure.
    Lee C; Levitt M
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1997; ():245-55. PubMed ID: 9390296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space.
    Koehl P; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Nov; 293(5):1183-93. PubMed ID: 10547294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient Monte Carlo model.
    Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):475-94. PubMed ID: 9726417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins.
    Desjarlais JR; Handel TM
    Protein Sci; 1995 Oct; 4(10):2006-18. PubMed ID: 8535237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The origins of protein secondary structure. Effects of packing density and hydrogen bonding studied by a fast conformational search.
    Hunt NG; Gregoret LM; Cohen FE
    J Mol Biol; 1994 Aug; 241(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 8057361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic algorithms for protein folding simulations.
    Unger R; Moult J
    J Mol Biol; 1993 May; 231(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 8496967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer modeling and folding of four-helix bundles.
    Rey A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 1993 May; 16(1):8-28. PubMed ID: 8497487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.