These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9391583)

  • 21. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
    Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness.
    Leake PA; Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ; Moore CM; Vollmer M
    Hear Res; 2000 Sep; 147(1-2):221-41. PubMed ID: 10962187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on inferior colliculus spatial representation in adult deafened cats.
    Moore CM; Vollmer M; Leake PA; Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ
    Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 164(1-2):82-96. PubMed ID: 11950528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.
    Fallon JB; Irvine DR; Shepherd RK
    J Comp Neurol; 2009 Jan; 512(1):101-14. PubMed ID: 18972570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intraoperative test of auditory nerve function.
    Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S93-4. PubMed ID: 9391614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implant users.
    Hey M; Kevanishvili I; von Specht H; Begall K; Kevanishvili Z
    Georgian Med News; 2007 Jun; (147):43-9. PubMed ID: 17660600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of chronic cochlear electrical stimulation after an extended period of profound deafness on primary auditory cortex organization in cats.
    Fallon JB; Shepherd RK; Irvine DR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 39(5):811-20. PubMed ID: 24325274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deafness-induced changes in the auditory pathway: implications for cochlear implants.
    Shepherd RK; Hardie NA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(6):305-18. PubMed ID: 11847461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The advanced Combi 40+ cochlear implant.
    Zierhofer CM; Hochmair IJ; Hochmair ES
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S37-8. PubMed ID: 9391589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multichannel cochlear implant for selective neuronal activation and chronic use in the free-moving Mongolian gerbil.
    Wiegner A; Wright CG; Vollmer M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Nov; 273():40-54. PubMed ID: 27519925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants in acutely deafened cats.
    George SS; Wise AK; Shivdasani MN; Shepherd RK; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Dec; 11(6):065003. PubMed ID: 25420148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on the cochlear nucleus in cats.
    Hultcrantz M; Snyder R; Rebscher S; Leake P
    Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 54(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 1938629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use.
    Gordon KA; Valero J; Papsin BC
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 17850999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Experimental study of extracochlear electric stimulation].
    Ni DF
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1992; 27(5):261-4, 318. PubMed ID: 1301761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Central electrical stimulation of the auditory pathway in neurofibromatosis type 2.
    Laszig R; Marangos N; Sollmann WP; Ramsden RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1999 Feb; 78(2):110-1, 115-7. PubMed ID: 10089696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants.
    Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Boerst A; Telian SA
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S90-2. PubMed ID: 9391613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees.
    Wable J; Frachet B; Gallégo S
    Audiology; 2001; 40(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 11688545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.