116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9391587)
1. Temporal representations with cochlear implants.
Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Zerbi M
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S30-4. PubMed ID: 9391587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute effects of electrical intracochlear multichannel high-rate stimulation of the auditory nerve of cats.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S19-20. PubMed ID: 9391581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Basic neurophysiology of cochlear-implants.
Klinke R; Hartmann R
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S7-10. PubMed ID: 9391576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of temporal properties on compound action potentials in response to amplitude-modulated electric pulse trains in guinea pigs.
Jeng FC; Abbas PJ; Hu N; Miller CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 19015019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
Clay KM; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 19068227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
Runge-Samuelson CL; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants.
Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Boerst A; Telian SA
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S90-2. PubMed ID: 9391613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
Xi X; Ji F; Han DY; Huang DL; Hong MD; Yang WY
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
