59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9391588)
1. Results from a pilot study using the nucleus CI24M/SP5 cochlear implant system.
Lai WK; Dillier N; Laszig R; Fisch U
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S35-6. PubMed ID: 9391588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech recognition performance of pediatric Clarion patients.
Zimmerman-Phillips S; Osberger MJ; Geier L; Barker M
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S153-4. PubMed ID: 9391641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early results using the nucleus CI24M in children.
Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Staller SJ; Hoffman RA
Am J Otol; 1999 Mar; 20(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 10100523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Gantz BJ
Am J Otol; 1998 May; 19(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 9596182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
Shallop JK; Facer GW; Peterson A
Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
Yucel E; Sennaroglu G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some experiences with the nucleus 20 + 2 cochlear implant in adults and children.
Linde G; Bredberg G; Lindström B
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S149-50. PubMed ID: 9391639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the new Clarion speech processor 1.2 in quiet and in noise.
Battmer RD; Feldmeier I; Kohlenberg A; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S144-6. PubMed ID: 9391637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
Hodges AV; Villasuso E; Balkany T; Bird PA; Butts S; Lee D; Gomez O
Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
