BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9391625)

  • 1. Auditory event-related potentials in post- and prelingually deaf cochlear implant recipients.
    Jordan K; Schmidt A; Plotz K; von Specht H; Begall K; Roth N; Scheich H
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S116-7. PubMed ID: 9391625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary results of auditory brainstem implantation in prelingually deaf children with inner ear malformations including severe stenosis of the cochlear aperture and aplasia of the cochlear nerve.
    Sennaroglu L; Ziyal I; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Yucel E; Sevinc S; Ekin MC; Sarac S; Atay G; Ozgen B; Ozcan OE; Belgin E; Colletti V; Turan E
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 19704357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Somatosensory phenomena after multichannel cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf adults.
    McFeely WJ; Antonelli PJ; Rodriguez FJ; Holmes AE
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jul; 19(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 9661756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implantation on prelingually deafened adults.
    Yoshida H; Kanda Y; Miyamoto I; Fukuda T; Takahashi H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Sep; 35(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 18248927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients.
    Micco AG; Kraus N; Koch DB; McGee TJ; Carrell TD; Sharma A; Nicol T; Wiet RJ
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jul; 16(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 8588653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hearing and speech discrimination scores of prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD; Egelierler B; Adunka O
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):492-7. PubMed ID: 10890127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T; Naito Y; Hirai T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.