These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9391629)

  • 1. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
    Cowan RS; DelDot J; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Pegg P; Dettman S; Galvin KL; Rance G; Hollow R; Dowell RC; Pyman B; Gibson WP; Clark GM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of residual high-frequency hearing on the outcome in congenitally deaf cochlear implant recipients.
    Kuo SC; Gibson WP
    Am J Otol; 2000 Sep; 21(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 10993454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids.
    Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S129-30. PubMed ID: 9391631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children.
    Dowell RC; Hollow R; Winton E
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 15148179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation.
    O'Donoghue GM; Nikolopoulos TP; Archbold SM; Tait M
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 9831151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pediatric cochlear implantation in Taiwan: long-term communication outcomes.
    Wang NM; Huang TS; Wu CM; Kirk KI
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov; 71(11):1775-82. PubMed ID: 17869350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implants for children with significant residual hearing.
    Dettman SJ; D'Costa WA; Dowell RC; Winton EJ; Hill KL; Williams SS
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):612-8. PubMed ID: 15148185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.