333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9391635)
1. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid.
Armstrong M; Pegg P; James C; Blamey P
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S140-1. PubMed ID: 9391635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception comparisons using an implanted and an external microphone in existing cochlear implant users.
Jenkins HA; Uhler K
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22158017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
Mok M; Galvin KL; Dowell RC; McKay CM
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
Cowan RS; DelDot J; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Pegg P; Dettman S; Galvin KL; Rance G; Hollow R; Dowell RC; Pyman B; Gibson WP; Clark GM
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.
Eisenberg LS; Kirk KI; Martinez AS; Ying EA; Miyamoto RT
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 15148177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids.
Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S129-30. PubMed ID: 9391631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.
Kiefer J; Pok M; Adunka O; Stürzebecher E; Baumgartner W; Schmidt M; Tillein J; Ye Q; Gstoettner W
Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 15724084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review.
de Kleijn JL; van Kalmthout LWM; van der Vossen MJB; Vonck BMD; Topsakal V; Bruijnzeel H
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 144(7):630-638. PubMed ID: 29800000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
