333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9391635)
21. Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing.
Shiomi Y; Naito Y; Honjo I; Fujiki N; Kaneko K; Takahashi H; Yamashita M; Kawano M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Oct; 26(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 10530732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system.
Müller J; Schön F; Helms J
Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 12072612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bimodal benefits of cochlear implant and hearing aid (on the non-implanted ear): a pilot study to develop a protocol and a test battery.
Ullauri A; Crofts H; Wilson K; Titley S
Cochlear Implants Int; 2007 Mar; 8(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 17479966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The identification of speech in noise by cochlear implant patients and normal-hearing listeners using 6-channel signal processors.
Dorman MF; Loizou PC; Fitzke J
Ear Hear; 1998 Dec; 19(6):481-4. PubMed ID: 9867296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.
Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
Park LR; Teagle HF; Buss E; Roush PA; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e1-e12. PubMed ID: 22531574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interaction between electric and acoustic cues in diotic condition for speech perception in quiet and noise by cochlear implantees.
Richard C; Ferrary E; Borel S; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 22158018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.
James C; Albegger K; Battmer R; Burdo S; Deggouj N; Deguine O; Dillier N; Gersdorff M; Laszig R; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Mondain M; Offeciers E; Macías AR; Ramsden R; Sterkers O; Von Wallenberg E; Weber B; Fraysse B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 16092537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears].
Tian Y; Zhou H; Zhang J; Yang D; Xu Y; Guo Y
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):868-70, 873. PubMed ID: 23285948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.
Yukawa K; Cohen L; Blamey P; Pyman B; Tungvachirakul V; O'Leary S
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 15084821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
van Hoesel RJ
Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
