210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9392324)
1. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years.
Feig SA
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 80(11):2035-9. PubMed ID: 9392324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis adjusting for compliance: the example of screening for breast cancer.
Glasziou PP
J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Nov; 45(11):1251-6. PubMed ID: 1432006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent?
Baines CJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1508-11. PubMed ID: 14559870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breast cancer screening--two years after].
Gøtzsche PC; Olsen O
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 11831091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit.
Kerlikowske K
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):79-86. PubMed ID: 9709281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Counterpoint).
Berg AO
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1511-2; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 14559871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography: reviewing the evidence. Epidemiology aspect.
Miller AB
Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():85-90. PubMed ID: 8435565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent? (Countering the counterpoint).
Baines CJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(20):1512-3. PubMed ID: 14559872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Response to Kopans.
Elwood JM; Cox B; Richardson AK
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 43():[1183 words; 9 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening?
Trop I; Deck W
Can Fam Physician; 2006 Sep; 52(9):1050-2. PubMed ID: 17279208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rejoinder to Elwood's reply.
Kopans DB
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Apr; Doc No 47():[1069 words; 5 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The controversy of mammography screening.
Kopans DB
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. After 40 years, mammography remains as much emotion as science.
Randal J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1630-2. PubMed ID: 11036103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximizing the benefits of screening mammography for women 40-49 years old.
Bastardis-Zakas K; Iatrakis G; Navrozoglou I; Peitsidis P; Salakos N; Malakassis P; Zervoudis S
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2010; 37(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 21355457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening.
Harris R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(14):1021-3. PubMed ID: 16030293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening mammography.
Prescrire Int; 2006 Oct; 15(85):192-3. PubMed ID: 17128530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Miller AB
Lancet; 2001 Dec 22-29; 358(9299):2164; author reply 2167-8. PubMed ID: 11784651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast screening in women aged 40-49 years: what next?
Dickersin K
Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1896-7. PubMed ID: 10371561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines.
Jackson VP
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 12409561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
