These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9392324)

  • 21. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Hendrick RE; Smith RA; Rutledge JH; Smart CR
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):87-92. PubMed ID: 9709282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biology and cost-benefit in mammography screening.
    Rutqvist LE
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36(7):673-4. PubMed ID: 9490081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Fu R; Cantor A; Pappas M; Daeges M; Humphrey L
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 26756588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening mammography in women over age 65.
    Kopans DB
    J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():59-62. PubMed ID: 1430884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.
    Daly L
    Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Mammography].
    Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mammograms: when and how often?
    Dest VM
    RN; 2004 Jun; 67(6):26-30; quiz 31. PubMed ID: 15317280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re: Short-interval follow-up mammography: are we doing the right thing?
    Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Aug; 95(15):1175-6. PubMed ID: 12902453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Breast cancer screening by mammography: evaluation by Gotzsche and Olsen meta-analysis].
    Agence Nationale d'Accrédiation et d'Evaluation en Santé
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12741380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening].
    Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal.
    Berry DA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Oct; 90(19):1431-9. PubMed ID: 9776408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Controversies on screening mammography].
    Steinke K; Dellas S; Bongartz G
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2005 Mar; 94(13):515-9. PubMed ID: 15839468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening fundamentals.
    Smith RA
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):15-9. PubMed ID: 9709269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.
    Mushlin AI; Kouides RW; Shapiro DE
    Am J Prev Med; 1998 Feb; 14(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 9631167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A different view on what is known about breast screening and the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
    Baines CJ
    Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1207-11. PubMed ID: 8055439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Screening mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer: facts, controversies, and the implementation in Israel].
    Allweis TM; Nissan A; Spira RM; Sklair-Levy M; Freund HR; Peretz T
    Harefuah; 2003 Apr; 142(4):281-6, 317. PubMed ID: 12754879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Mass screening of cancer of the breast: politico-economic objectives and their underestimated risks].
    Dilhuydy MH
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 Jun; 26(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 9691519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-interval follow-up mammography: are we doing the right thing?
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Sickles EA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):418-9. PubMed ID: 12644528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A doctor talks about screening mammography.
    Robb-Nicholson C
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 Feb; 17(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 20429119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammographic screening trials for women aged under 50.
    Furnival CM; Hirst C
    Med J Aust; 1995 Oct; 163(7):384-5. PubMed ID: 7565266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.