These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9393461)

  • 1. Perception of postpalatoplasty speech differences in school-age children by parents, teachers, and professional speech pathologists.
    Witt PD; Miller DC; Marsh JL; Muntz HR; Grames LM; Pilgram TK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Dec; 100(7):1655-63. PubMed ID: 9393461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech outcome following palatoplasty in primary school children: do lay peer observers agree with speech pathologists?
    Witt PD; Berry LA; Marsh JL; Grames LM; Pilgram TK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Nov; 98(6):958-65; discussion 966-70. PubMed ID: 8911465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech intelligibility of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutch cleft) following a one-stage Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty, as judged by their parents.
    Van Lierde KM; Luyten A; Van Borsel J; Baudonck N; Debusschere T; Vermeersch H; Bonte K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 20456922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transforming assessment of speech in children with cleft palate via online crowdsourcing.
    Sescleifer AM; Francoisse CA; Webber JC; Rector JD; Lin AY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227686. PubMed ID: 31917818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual assessment of resonance distortion in unoperated clefts of the secondary palate.
    Mayo R; Dalston RM; Warren DW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Jul; 30(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 8399269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blinded speech evaluation following pharyngeal flap surgery by speech pathologists and lay people in children with cleft palate.
    Tönz M; Schmid I; Graf M; Mischler-Heeb R; Weissen J; Kaiser G
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(6):288-95. PubMed ID: 12417799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech results of cleft palate surgery: two methods of assessment.
    Bagnall AD; David DJ
    Br J Plast Surg; 1988 Sep; 41(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 3179594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a perceptual evaluation instrument to assess the effects of infant orthopedics on the speech of toddlers with cleft lip and palate.
    Konst EM; Rietveld T; Peters HF; Weersink-Braks H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Nov; 40(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 14577817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term stability of postpalatoplasty perceptual speech ratings: a prospective study.
    Witt PD; Cohen DT; Muntz HR; Grames LM; Pilgram TK; Marsh JL
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Sep; 43(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 10490174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability results of perceptual ratings of resonance, nasal airflow and speech acceptability in patients with cleft palate by Ugandan speech-language pathologists following a two-day workshop.
    Bruneel L; Alighieri C; D'haeseleer E; Kissel I; Adriaansen A; Sseremba D; Van Lierde K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 136():110191. PubMed ID: 32593063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech Perceptions and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Children With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Bickham RS; Ranganathan K; Wombacher NR; Shapiro DN; Carlozzi NE; Baker MK; Vercler CJ; Warschausky SA; Buchman SR; Waljee JF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):1264-1268. PubMed ID: 28665843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agreements between speech language pathologists and naïve listeners' judgements of intelligibility in children with cleft palate.
    Hashemi Hosseinabad H; Ishikawa K; Washington K
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1010-1028. PubMed ID: 34597196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech ratings by speech clinicians, parents and children.
    Starr CD; Moller KT; Dawson W; Graham J; Skaar S
    Cleft Palate J; 1984 Oct; 21(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 6595084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conversational skills of preschool and school-age children with cleft lip and palate.
    Chapman KL; Graham KT; Gooch J; Visconti C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Nov; 35(6):503-16. PubMed ID: 9832222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parent questionnaire for screening early language development in children with cleft palate.
    Scherer NJ; D'Antonio LL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1995 Jan; 32(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 7727490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech characteristics associated with the Furlow palatoplasty as compared with other surgical techniques.
    McWilliams BJ; Randall P; LaRossa D; Cohen S; Yu J; Cohen M; Solot C
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Sep; 98(4):610-9; discussion 620-1. PubMed ID: 8773683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lay evaluations of speech results following palatoplasty revisited.
    Witt PD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):667-70. PubMed ID: 14758233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of appearance and speech by adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate and by their parents.
    Strauss RP; Broder H; Helms RW
    Cleft Palate J; 1988 Oct; 25(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 3203464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.