These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9394246)
41. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection use in states with and without insurance coverage mandates for infertility treatment, United States, 2000-2015. Dieke AC; Mehta A; Kissin DM; Nangia AK; Warner L; Boulet SL Fertil Steril; 2018 Apr; 109(4):691-697. PubMed ID: 29580644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Medicare program; Medicare prescription drug benefit. Final rule. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2005 Jan; 70(18):4193-585. PubMed ID: 15678603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Great Recession, insurance mandates, and the use of in vitro fertilization services in the United States. Kiatpongsan S; Huckman RS; Hornstein MD Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):448-54. PubMed ID: 25497450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization. Nachtigall RD; MacDougall K; Davis AC; Beyene Y Fertil Steril; 2012 Jan; 97(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22118993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Deciding on access and levels of care: a comparison of Canada, Britain, Germany, and the United States. Grogan CM J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(2):213-32. PubMed ID: 1500646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective. Martin JR; Bromer JG; Sakkas D; Patrizio P Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):964-9. PubMed ID: 20688327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995. Collins JA; Bustillo M; Visscher RD; Lawrence LD Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep; 64(3):538-45. PubMed ID: 7641907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. IVF and the internet. Blank RH Politics Life Sci; 1999 Mar; 18(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 11865879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Federal employees dental and vision insurance program. Final rule. Office of Personnel Management Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(166):50183-8. PubMed ID: 18958943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Paying for family planning. Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9131):831. PubMed ID: 9742971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Reproductive technology: in the Netherlands, tolerance and debate. De Wachter MA; De Wert GM Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S15-6. PubMed ID: 11644022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE “HAVE” AND THE “HAVE-NOTS”: THE ACA PROHIBITS INSURANCE COVERAGE DISCRIMINATION BASED UPON INFERTILITY STATUS. Mastroianni MA Albany Law Rev; 2016; 79(1):151-81. PubMed ID: 27071222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Formulating selection policies for assisted reproduction. Daniels K; Taylor K Soc Sci Med; 1993 Dec; 37(12):1473-80. PubMed ID: 8303331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. RESOLVE and access to care: the patient response to anti-family policies. Collura B; Collins LR Semin Reprod Med; 2013 May; 31(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 23609154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The many meanings of deinsuring a health service: the case of in vitro fertilization in Ontario. Giacomini M; Hurley J; Stoddart G Soc Sci Med; 2000 May; 50(10):1485-500. PubMed ID: 10741583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cost-effective treatment for the couple with infertility. Van Voorhis BJ; Syrop CH Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Dec; 43(4):958-73. PubMed ID: 11100309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]