BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9394397)

  • 1. Comparison of graphite-to-water absorbed-dose transfers for 60Co photon beams using ionometry and Fricke dosimetry.
    Chauvenet B; Baltès D; Delaunay F
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Nov; 42(11):2053-63. PubMed ID: 9394397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental determination of beam quality conversion factors k(Q) in clinical photon beams using ferrous sulphate (Fricke) dosimetry.
    Palm A; Mattsson O
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2756-62. PubMed ID: 12512708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculation of perturbation correction factors for some reference dosimeters in high-energy photon beams with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Mazurier J; Gouriou J; Chauvenet B; Barthe J
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jun; 46(6):1707-17. PubMed ID: 11419629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of dosimetric standards of Canada and France for photons at 60Co and higher energies.
    Shortt K; Ross C; Seuntjens J; Delaunay F; Ostrowsky A; Gross P; Leroy E
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2119-42. PubMed ID: 11512615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams.
    Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Primary Standard of Absorbed Dose to Water in High-energy Photon Beam Irradiation].
    Shimizu M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2014; 34(3):154-61. PubMed ID: 26288882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction factors for Farmer-type chambers for absorbed dose determination in 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Tölli H; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3171-81. PubMed ID: 9832009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the BIPM calorimetric and ionometric standards in megavoltage photon beams to determine Wair and Ic.
    Burns DT; Picard S; Kessler C; Roger P
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1353-65. PubMed ID: 24583932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
    Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluation of correction factors of a primary standard graphite calorimeter in 60Co gamma ray beams as a basis for the appointment of the BEV absorbed dose rate to water reference value.
    Baumgartner A; Steurer A; Tiefenböck W; Gabris F; Maringer FJ; Kapsch RP; Stucki G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Apr; 145(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21112889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose conversion and wall correction factors for Fricke dosimetry in high-energy photon beams: analytical model and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Ma CM; Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Jan; 38(1):93-114. PubMed ID: 8426871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of the absorbed dose to water for medium-energy x-ray beams using Fricke dosimetry.
    Rosado PH; Salata C; David MG; Mantuano A; Pickler A; Mota CL; de Almeida CE
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5802-5809. PubMed ID: 32964481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of ferrous sulfate (Fricke) and ionization dosimetry for high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Kwa W; Kornelsen RO
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):602-6. PubMed ID: 2215405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of factors to convert absorbed dose calibrations from graphite to water for the NPL high-energy photon calibration service.
    Nutbrown RF; Duane S; Shipley DR; Thomas RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):441-54. PubMed ID: 11858210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorbed dose determination at short distance from 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy sources.
    Tölli H; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3183-94. PubMed ID: 9832010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The UK primary standard calorimeter for photon-beam absorbed dose measurement.
    DuSautoy AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jan; 41(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 8685252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.