These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9394397)

  • 41. Fricke dosimetry: the difference between G(Fe3+) for 60Co gamma-rays and high-energy x-rays.
    Klassen NV; Shortt KR; Seuntjens J; Ross CK
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 44(7):1609-24. PubMed ID: 10442700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Development of the 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w))].
    Fukumura A; Mizuno H; Fukahori M; Sakata S
    Igaku Butsuri; 2012; 32(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 24568023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Commissioning of an NRC-type sealed water calorimeter at METAS using 60Co gamma-rays.
    Medin J; Ross CK; Stucki G; Klassen NV; Seuntjens JP
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):4073-86. PubMed ID: 15470924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An investigation of the photon energy dependence of the EPR alanine dosimetry system.
    Bergstrand ES; Shortt KR; Ross CK; Hole EO
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1753-71. PubMed ID: 12870581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations.
    Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Nahum AE; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):983-95. PubMed ID: 10795986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of chemical and ionization dosimetry for high-energy x-ray and electron beams.
    Durocher JJ; Boese H; Cormack DV; Holloway AF
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 6798385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
    Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
    Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of w values for carbon beams in air, using a graphite calorimeter.
    Sakama M; Kanai T; Fukumura A; Abe K
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(5):1111-30. PubMed ID: 19174597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reference dosimetry for light-ion beams based on graphite calorimetry.
    Rossomme S; Palmans H; Thomas R; Lee N; Duane S; Bailey M; Shipley D; Bertrand D; Romano F; Cirrone P; Cuttone G; Vynckier S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):92-5. PubMed ID: 24336190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On the p(dis) correction factor for cylindrical chambers.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):L9-16; author reply L17-9. PubMed ID: 20157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Monte Carlo study of correction factors for Spencer-Attix cavity theory at photon energies at or above 100 keV.
    Borg J; Kawrakow I; Rogers DW; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1804-13. PubMed ID: 10984227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Absorbed dose comparison among commercial ionization chambers in polystyrene and acrylic phantoms.
    Kubo H; Cheng P
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 3273884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dosimetry of pulsed clinical proton beams by a small ionization chamber.
    Nohtomi A; Sakae T; Tsunashima Y; Kohno R
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1431-5. PubMed ID: 11488575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Feasibility of using a dose-area product ratio as beam quality specifier for photon beams with small field sizes.
    Pimpinella M; Caporali C; Guerra AS; Silvi L; De Coste V; Petrucci A; Delaunay F; Dufreneix S; Gouriou J; Ostrowsky A; Rapp B; Bordy JM; Daures J; Le Roy M; Sommier L; Vermesse D
    Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():106-116. PubMed ID: 29472074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
    Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Monte Carlo and
    Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Deduction of the air w value in a therapeutic proton beam.
    Siebers JV; Vatnitsky SM; Miller DW; Moyers MF
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1339-56. PubMed ID: 7480117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.